Category Archives: prints and drawings

prints and drawings

Grandma’s Kitchen

gag wanda3
gag wanda2

gag wanda

Wanda Gag (1893-1946), Grandma’s Kitchen, 1931. Lithograph. Graphic Arts Collection GA 2008.00407.

Minnesota-born Wanda Gág was a struggling young artist when Carl Zigrosser gave her a one-woman-show in his Weyhe Gallery in 1926. The Greenwich Village feminist was also outspoken about women’s rights and published an article stating her views in Nation magazine on June 22, 1927. “These Modern Women: A Hotbed of Feminists” began with an editorial note, “We print herewith the seventeenth and last of a series of anonymous articles giving the personal backgrounds of a group of distinguished women with a modern point of view.”

Ernestine Evans at Coward-McCann Books saw the article and liked both her politics and her art. She offered Gág the possibility of doing a children’s book with their firm and Gág delivered Millions of Cats in 1928 (which is still in print today). The book won a Newbery honor award the following year and led to a series of lithographs, loosely based on the premise. One of them made its way into Elmer Adler’s collection and was circulated at Princeton University as part of our Princeton Print Club exchange in the 1940s.

Wanda Gág (1893-1946), Millions of cats (New York: Coward-McCann, inc., 1938, c1928). Gift of Frank J. Mather, Jr. Graphic Arts Collection (GAX) 2003-0111N.

Wanda Gág (1893-1946), Millions of cats (New York, Coward-McCann, 1928). Cotsen Children’s Library (CTSN) Eng 20 94934bcc9cad2d7595db652d011b836bccb40

Jonathan Sturges

sterner3
sterner2
Jonathan Sturges (1864-1911), a member of the Princeton Class of 1885, began writing for the Nassau Literary Magazine during his junior year. He later boasted that it was “a journal whose Addisonian simplicity & ponderous traditions I endeavoured to relieve by the publication of several stories of my own begetting.”

Four years after graduation, Sturges published The Odd Number, a translation of thirteen stories by Guy dc Maupassant (1850-1893). The Princetonian saluted the achievement, describing the book as having “a very rapid sale. The first edition of 1500 appeared the last of October and sold out almost immediately. The second edition of 1,000 is exhausted and the third edition is in press.” (9 December 1889).

Settling in London, Sturges wrote travel letters for The New York Times and short stories for Harper’s and Cosmopolitan. He joined a circle of friends that included Henry James (1843-1916), John Singer Sargent (1856-1925), and James Whistler (1834-1903), with whom he collaborated on The Baronet and The Butterfly magazines.

After Sturges death in 1911, his sister commissioned a pastel sketch from Harper’s illustrator Albert Sterner (1863-1946), which was completed after a portrait owned by Mary Fuller Sturges (Mrs. Andrew Chalmers) Wilson (1870-1962). The pastel was photographed and one copy hung over Henry James’s desk until his own death four years later.

 

sterner

Albert Edward Sterner (1863-1946), Jonathan Sturges, 1912. Pastel and charcoal on paper. Graphic Arts Collection GA 2006.02652.

Gwathmey

gwathmey2

Robert Gwathmey (1903-1988), Portrait of a farmer’s wife, 1954. Screen print. Graphic Arts Collection GA 2008.00416.

Robert Gwathmey (1903-1988) created colorful paintings and screen prints depicting rural life in the American south. When the artist had his first important New York show in 1946. Paul Robeson (1898-1976) wrote an essay for the catalog, commenting “In the coming years, when as we all hope, true equality and the brotherhood of man will be a reality, Gwathmey’s paintings will have earned him the right to feel that he has shared in the shaping of a better world.” (Annex A ND237.G98 A5)

gwathmey1

Robert Gwathmey (1903-1988), Watching the Parade, 1947. Screen print. Graphic Arts Collection GA 2008.00417.

In his Gwathmey biography, Michael Kammen writes,

Robert and Rosalie returned from Philadelphia to her family home in Charlotte during the last stage of her pregnancy, and Charles was born there in June 1938. Coming back to the South for a spell had immense consequences for Robert’s sense of place and its implications for his art. He later recalled the initial shock of returning to Richmond following his first year at the academy: “Suddenly, I saw with terrible clarity how it was, especially how it was for the Negro in the South. Things I had always taken for granted. That’s when my politics changed, long before the Depression came along.” Robert Gwathmey: The Life and Art of a Passionate Observer (The University of North Carolina Press)

Georges Gremillet

gremillet5 Georges Gremillet (1893-1971), Montmartre. Descriptive notes by H. de Labruyere (Paris: Edmond Chognard, 1928?). 13 etchings variously signed, dated and titled in the plate; lettered with publication detail and address of artist on cover: Au singe qui lit, 4 Place du tertre, 12 & 14 rue Lamarck, Paris 18e. Graphic Arts Collection GAX 2015- in process. Gift of David McAlpin, Jr., Class of 1950.

ob_406174_singe-qui-lit-carte5

In the 19th century, the inexpensive working class neighborhood of Montmartre became the home for artists, actors, and writers. By the 1920s, when Georges Gremillet moved in, the bohemian 18th arrondissement was the destination for wealthy art collectors and tourists.

Gremillet specialized in etchings offering charming views of Paris, which he hung in his Montmartre shop, known as Au singe qui lit (The Monkey that Reads). Located at 4 Place du Tertre, Gremillet was in the exact center of Montmartre’s central square, in the area where artists spent their days in the sidewalk cafes and their nights in the cabarets, dance halls, theaters, and bars.

Today, Gremillet’s shop is still open, filled with postcards and posters for visiting art historians. The Graphic Arts Collection is fortunate to have received a gift of two Gremillet portfolios from the 1920s, holding dozens of the artist’s drypoints and etchings. Thanks to David H. McAlpin, Jr., Class of 1950 for these wonderful new acquisitions.
gremillet4
gremillet3
gremillet1

See more: http://www.montmartre-secret.com/2015/01/le-singe-qui-lit-montmartre-place-du-tertre.html

 

Princeton University Library Chronicle double issue

versailles chronicleThe exhibition “Versailles on Paper: A Graphic Panorama of the Palace and Gardens of Louis XIV,” on view in the Main Gallery of Firestone Library until July 19, 2015, is accompanied by a special double issue of the Princeton University Library Chronicle (Volume LXXVI, numbers 1 & 2, autumn 2014–winter 2015). The volume’s 296 pages offer 8 scholarly essays with 77 black and white illustrations.

Friends of the Princeton University Library (FPUL) will receive a copy in the mail very soon and others who would like to join the FPUL, can still receive a free copy of the Chronicle with their membership. To join, see: http://www.fpul.org/chronicle/index.html. Single issues are $30 plus postage.

versailles chronicle6

versailles chronicle9

This issue contains the following articles:

Audrey Adamczak, “Engraving Sculpture: Depictions of Versailles Statuary in the Cabinet du Roi”

This essay examines the presence of the sculpted object in prints that celebrated the treasures of the crown, especially those displayed at Versailles. Sculptures are well represented among the works of art selected to be engraved for the collection known as Cabinet du Roi. The most renowned works, both ancient and modern, were represented for their own sake and not just as secondary subjects. Engravings took various forms, depending upon the model and the printmaker’s technical choices. The goal of this essay is twofold: to analyze the techniques used by individual engravers to reproduce the medium of sculpture and render its effects; and to highlight the value of these prints as a graphic record of the Versailles statuary, much of which has been dispersed, destroyed, or irrevocably altered.

Hall Bjørnstad, “From the Cabinet of Fairies to the Cabinet of the King: The Marvelous Workings of Absolutism”

What do fairy-tale kings have in common with real-life absolute monarchs? If we turn to the case of Jean de Préchac’s 1698 fairy tale about King Sans Parangon (Without Equal), the answer is: quite a bit. An allegorical retelling of the life of Louis XIV, structured according to the whims of an enchanted Chinese princess named Belle Gloire, this tale is often read as mere flattery without any interest beyond the excess of its praise. However, this paper argues that a close analysis of certain key scenes of “Sans Parangon,” especially the one portrayed in the engraving illustrating the second edition of the text in 1717, will bring us surprisingly close to the inner workings of absolutism.

versailles chronicle5

Benoît Bolduc, “Fêtes on Paper: Graphic Representations of Louis XIV’s Festivals at Versailles”

In the three illustrated festival books commemorating the divertissements given by Louis XIV in 1664, 1668, and 1674, Versailles becomes a site for performing monarchical authority. The plates, designed by Israël Sylvestre, Jean Lepautre and François Chauveau, illustrating the equestrian parades, buffets of refreshments, musical entertainments, and pyrotechnical displays offered to the court, showcase the newly designed gardens of Versailles as a decorous and enchanted space where art and nature merge to the point of becoming indistinguishable. The printed account by André Félibien insists on the miraculous nature of the settings and achieves the goals of classical ekphrasis by mimicking the effects produced by the experience of the festival, leading the reader toward the sublime contemplation of the generative power of the French king.

Thomas F. Hedin, “Facts, Sermons, and Riddles: The Curious Guidebook of Sieur Combes”

The Explication historique de ce qu’il y a de plus remarquable dans la maison royale de Versailles, et en celle de Monsieur à Saint Cloud, was published by Laurent Morellet (alias Combes or Sieur Combes) in 1681, a time of euphoria and national pride: the Dutch War had ended, to French advantage, three years earlier; the château and gardens of Versailles were brimming with new works of art; the Grand Dauphin’s recent marriage held high promise of royal progeny. Combes, the chaplain to Monsieur, the King’s brother, was on hand to celebrate the joyous moment. His book contains information on Versailles found nowhere else in the contemporary literature. Offsetting his passion for documentary detail, Combes subjected some of the most prominent statues and fountains to purely fantastic, self-indulgent “explications.” Nor could he resist the temptation to treat the gardens as a pulpit, to lecture his congregation of readers, particularly the ladies of the court, on his notions of Christian morality; he often appeals to his dedicatee, the newly-wed Grande Dauphine. The researcher is advised to tread cautiously through this fascinating, meandering book.

versailles chronicle3

Betsy Rosasco, “The Herms of Versailles in the 1680s”

Following the first set of herms executed for Versailles in the 1660s, and the purchase from Nicolas Fouquet’s son in 1683 of a second set of herms designed by Nicolas Poussin for Vaux-le-Vicomte, the Versailles gardens received a third set of herms, commissioned by the Marquis de Louvois, Surintendant des Bâtiments, beginning in 1684. Consisting of literary figures (Ulysses and Circe), Olympian gods (Jupiter, Juno…), lesser deities (Faun, Bacchante…), and Greek philosophers (Plato, Diogenes…), these understudied sculptures were designed mainly by Pierre Mignard,but in two cases Charles Le Brun and Jules Hardouin-Mansart’s team, and executed by distinguished masters such as Corneille van Clève and Étienne Le Hongre. It is argued that, unlike the earlier herms – expressive of galant or Bacchic themes appropriate to rural surroundings and pleasures – these herms were didactic and intended for the education of the Duc de Bourgogne, the future dauphin of France. Suggestions are advanced about the content of the lessons and the possible use of the sculptures as a Memory Palace.

Volker Schröder, “Royal Prints for Princeton College: A Franco-American Exchange in 1886”

Many of the prints displayed on the walls of the main gallery of Firestone Library during the exhibition “Versailles on Paper” belong to a vast collection known as the Cabinet du Roi: copperplate engravings produced and distributed by order of Louis XIV. They came to Princeton in 1886, when the Bibliothèque Nationale sent four large boxes of books and prints to the College of New Jersey in exchange for more than three hundred volumes on the American Civil War donated by John Shaw Pierson (1822–1908), Class of 1840. The discovery of this curious transaction during the preparation of the exhibition raised a number of questions that the present essay attempts to answer: What led Pierson to act as foreign agent on behalf of his alma mater, and how did he approach the Bibliothèque Nationale? Why was the Cabinet du Roi included in the exchange, and how were these prints received and used at Princeton? While John S. Pierson’s role in the early development of Princeton’s historical collections is well known, the 1886 exchange with the Bibliothèque Nationale (and other European libraries) has been all but forgotten. It deserves to be brought back to light and calls for a broader reassessment of Pierson’s purpose as a collector and benefactor.

Alan M. Stahl, “The Classical Program of the Medallic Series of Louis XIV”

In the preface to the 1702 deluxe folio edition of the Médailles sur les principaux événements du règne de Louis le Grand, avec des explications historiques, the Abbé Paul Tallemant set out the purpose and procedures underlying the production of the volume and the medallic series which it accompanied. Like many other aspects of the culture of the court of Louis XIV, the medallic series sought both to emulate and surpass the achievements of classical antiquity, in this case the high relief coins produced by the emperors of the first two centuries of the Roman Empire. This article examines the procedures and structures of the Petite Académie (which included Charles Perrault, Jean Racine and Nicolas Boileau-Despréaux), charged with the creation of images and inscriptions for the series, and the extent to which the resulting medals achieved the stated goals and set a pattern for the future of the medium.
versailles chronicle4

Carolyn Yerkes, “The Grand Escalier at the Château de Versailles: The Monumental Staircase and Its Edges”

The Grand Escalier, also called the Grand Degré or the Escalier des Ambassadeurs, is one of the most significant architectural elements to have disappeared from the château of Versailles. Completed in 1679, this element had a hybrid function: not only was it the principal staircase of the palace, the primary means of access to the state rooms on the second floor, but it also was the official reception point for foreign dignitaries and thus a ceremonial space in its own right. The Grand Escalier was meant to be a tour de force, a display of architectural bravado that combined a relatively new form of staircase design with a lavish decorative treatment. Yet despite its spatial and functional importance, the staircase was short-lived, destroyed in 1752 under Louis XV. Its particulars are known mainly from seventeenth- and eighteenth-century prints that detail every aspect of its original appearance. These prints of the Grand Escalier mark the intersection of two trajectories in French architectural theory: the representation of the staircase as a demonstration of technical achievement and the representation of the interior as an essential component of planning and design. The prints demonstrate how the Grand Escalier departed from the Renaissance tradition of the showpiece staircase, a tradition in which a staircase’s independence from the wall as a means of support became a sign of structural daring. Instead, the Grand Escalier’s virtuosity is the way it merges with the wall, effectively incorporating the inhabitants of the room as the final elements of a complex decorative program.

Our thanks to the Friends of the Princeton University Library for their support of exhibitions and publications celebrating the superb materials in Princeton’s Rare Books and Special Collections.

versailles chronicle2

Delacroix’s Hamlet

hamlet delacroix 7

Eugène Delacroix (1798-1863), Hamlet, 1834-43, 1864. 16 lithographs. Printed by Bertauts, published by Dusacq & Cie. Graphic Arts Collection. Gift of Sinclair Hamilton.

hamlet delacroix 6
In 1949, Sinclair Hamilton, Class of 1906, donated an unbound set of Eugène Delacroix’s Hamlet to the Graphic Arts Collection. The 16 lithographs were drawn by the artist between 1834 and 1843, and printed by Betauts at his shop at 11, rue Cadet in Paris. They represent state iia/iv, in which the impressions were printed aver cache (with text masked) but with Betauts’s blindstamp. Unfortunately, the rare title page to the set is not included.hamlet delacroix 5

hamlet

Eugène Delacroix, Hamlet and His Mother, 1849. Oil on canvas. © Metropolitan Museum of Art. Bequest of Miss Adelaide Milton de Groot (1876–1967).

It was the artist’s second attempt at a lithographic portfolio on a literary theme, the first being Goethe’s Faust in 1828.

According to Alan Young, “Delacroix published at his own expense in 1844 a small edition (eighty copies) of thirteen Hamlet lithographs . . . variously dated 1834, 1835, and 1843.”

After the death of Delacroix in 1863, Paul Meurice acquired the stones for these, together with three stones not used for the 1844 edition. Meurice then published all sixteen lithographs in an edition of two hundred copies.”

“Between the 1930s and his death, Delacroix also painted versions in oil of a number of the lithographs [including Hamlet and His Mother, now at the Metropolitan Museum]….”–Alan R. Young, Hamlet and the Visual Arts, 1709-1900 (University of Delaware Press, 2002): 109.hamlet delacroix 4

hamlet delacroix 3

hamlet delacroix 2

For details, see: Loys Delteil and Susan Strauber. Delacroix, The Graphic Work: A Catalogue Raisonné, San Francisco, 1997. Marquand Art Library

Graphic Arts Collection plates include:
La reine s’efforce de consoler Hamlet (the Queen tries to console Hamlet), 1834. D103 iia/iv
Hamlet veut suivre l’ombre de son père (Hamlet Tries to Follow His Father’s Ghost), 1835. D104 iia/iv
Le fantôme sur la terrasse (The Ghost on the Terrace), 1843. D105 ia/iii
Polonius et Hamlet (Polonius and Hamlet), [no date]. D106 iia/iv
Hamlet et Ophélie (Hamlet and Ophelia), [no date]. D107 iia/iv
Hamlet et Guildenstern (Hamlet and Guildenstern), [no date]. D108 iia/iv
Hamlet fait jouer aux comédiens la scène de l’empoisonnement de son père (Hamlet Has the Actors Play the Scene of His Father’s poisoning), 1835. D109 iia/iv
Hamlet tente de tuer le roe (Hamlet Attempts to Kill the King), 1843. D110 iia/iii
Le meurtre de polonius (The Murder of Polonius), [no date]. D111 iia/iii
Hamlet et la reine (Hamlet and the Queen), 1834. D112 iiia/v
Hamlet et le cadaver de Polonius (Hamlet and the Corpse of Polonius), 1835. D113 iia/iv
Le chant d’Ophélie (Ophelia’s Song), 1834. D144 iia/v
Mort d’Ophélie (Death of Ophelia), 1843. D115 iia/iv
Hamlet et Horatio devant les fossoyeurs (Hamlet and Horatio with the grave Diggers), 1843. D116 iia/iv
Hamlet et Laertes dans la fosse d’Ophélie (Hamlet and Laertes in Ophelia’s Grave), 1843. D117 iia/iv
Mort d’Hamlet (Hamlet’s Death), 1843. D118 iia/iv
hamlet delacroix 1

Werner Drewes

drewes negress praying

Werner Drewes (1899-1985), Untitled [Negress in red shirt praying], 1932. Woodcut. Graphic Arts Collection (GAX) 2007-01207

 

During the 1920s, the German-born printmaker Werner Drewes studied at the Bauhaus with László Moholy-Nagy, Wassily Kandinsky, and perhaps most importantly, Lyonel Feininger who taught him to make woodblock prints.

In 1930, Drewes was forced to immigrate to the United States, where he was given his first American exhibition at the 135th Street branch of the New York Public Library in Harlem.

For this show, the artist cut and printed portraits of many of his neighbors. Happily, several of these prints came to Princeton in the 1940s as part of the Princeton Print Club collection and are still enjoyed here today.

drewes negress


Werner Drewes (1899-1985), Untitled [Negro girl], 1930. Woodcut. Graphic Arts Collection (GAX) 2007-01208

drewes indian block

Werner Drewes (1899-1985), Indian, no date. Woodblock. Graphic Arts Collection

drewes self portrait

Werner Drewes (1899-1985), Self-portrait, 1932. Woodcut. Graphic Arts Collection (GAX) 2007-01206

index.phpView of the northwest corner of West 135th Street and Lenox Avenue, with the West 135th Street Branch of The New York Public Library (Schomburg Center) at left, 1920s.

The Worship of Bacchus Returns

cruikshank worship of bacchus

George Cruikshank (1792-1878), Worship of Bacchus, or The Drinking Customs of Society, June 20, 1864. Steel engraving. Graphic Arts collection. Gift of Richard W. Meirs, Class of 1888.

Cruikshank Bacchus

George Cruikshank, The Worship of Bacchus. Oil on canvas. (c) Tate Britain

cruikshank worship of bacchus2
Missing since we last looked for it in 2008, this mammoth print by George Cruikshank (1792-1878) entitled Worship of Bacchus, or The Drinking Customs of Society (June 20, 1864) was recently uncovered and returned to the Graphic Arts Collection.

A gift from Richard W. Meirs, Class of 1888, the steel engraving is over 100 centimeters long. It reproduces of the well-known oil painting by Cruikshank, printed by Richard Holdgate and published by William Tweedie in London. Note the lunatic asylum at the top, next to the prison with gallows on the roof.
cruikshank worship of bacchus6
cruikshank worship of bacchus5
cruikshank worship of bacchus3

cruikshank worship of bacchus7
The Tate’s painting was also removed from public view for a long time and only recently restored for the exhibition Rude Britannia. To see the scale of the original watch this video: http://bcove.me/1k8xwgdy

For an explanation of the iconography, see: John Stewart, The worship of Bacchus: size 13 ft. 4 in. by 7 ft. 8in: painted by George Cruikshank: a critique of the above painting; a descriptive lecture by George Cruikshank; and opinions of the press. 6th ed. (London: W. Tweedie, 1862). Graphic Arts Collection (GA) Cruik 939

Lithography in Cincinnati

midnight bell3The Graphic Arts Collection holds a number of American lithographic posters, most of them printed in Cincinnati. In January 1867 the job printing portion of the Cincinnati Enquirer newspaper was purchased by Maj. A. O. Russell, Robert J. Morgan, James M. Armstrong and John F. Robinson Jr. (owner of the Robinson Bros. Circus and the Robinson Opera House), who incorporated under the name of Russell, Morgan & Company. The company printed posters and circulars for theaters, circuses, and other firms around the country.

midnight bell2“In the extension of the art of lithography into color work, Cincinnati printing concerns at once step into first place. As a lithographic center, this city has no superior in point of product or its quality. There is established in Cincinnati the only general lithographers’ supply house west of New York, and it is said to be the best stocked and most thoroughly equipped of any in the country, barring none. This in itself is a commentary on the importance of this city in this line.”

midnight bell
school girl3“There are three distinct lines in which Cincinnati leads the world. They are in the printing of posters, labels and playing cards. The poster work done here cannot be praised too highly. It is the largest and finest business of the kind in the world, and that these may not appear to be unwarranted claims, it is needed but to tell the facts that Cincinnati has practically all of the printing of posters to do for all the circuses of the country, and at least seventy-five per cent, of the theatrical work. It is a pioneer in the business. The first circus bill of at all modern size was set by the late A. O. Russell by hand, and from this early and simple beginning the business has grown to its present enormous proportions, and has earned its reputation as first city in the world in this branch. One other fact might be mentioned to show the good reason for these claims.”

school girl2
school girl “…From figures carefully collected and compiled by the Cincinnati Typothetae it is shown that there are in that city one hundred and seventy printing offices. These offices use three hundred and seventy-five cylinder presses, four hundred and twenty-five job presses and one hundred and sixty-eight paper cutting machines. There are sixty-two of these offices that have cylinder presses with capacity to deliver 4.500,000 printed sheets per day. The job presses in the city have a capacity of 6,375,000 printed sheets per day. It is estimated from sources that are quite reliable that the one hundred and seventy printing concerns in Cincinnati have a combined capital of something over $5,000,000. The three thousand six hundred and fifty employees receive in wages $2,900,000, while the total value of the printed output is $6,500,000.”

“These concerns use annually $125,000 worth of printing ink, and the large size of some of Cincinnati’s printing concerns can be seen from the fact that one concern uses almost half of this amount of ink. The amount of ink that is used by a lithographer or showbill printer is much greater than that used in book or job printing, since in the former case it is put on almost solid. The cost of the inks used by these large concerns is greater than the cost of the black inks and the news inks that are used in the other departments.” – “Printing in Cincinnati,” American Printer and Lithographer 31 (1900), pp.98-99.

modern cinderella

Learning to make woodblock prints

nordfeldt training oxford3Frank Morley Fletcher (1866-1950), Wood-Block Printing; a Description of the Craft of Woodcutting & Colour Printing Based on the Japanese Practice; with drawings and illustrations by the author and A.W. Seaby; Also collotype reproductions of various examples of printing and an original print designed and cut by the author printed by hand on Japanese paper (London: J. Hogg, 1916). From the printing collection of Elmer Adler. Graphic Arts Collection (GAX) NE1225.F5

When 20th century artists wanted to learn to make traditional woodblock prints, they traveled to Great Britain to study with F. Morley Fletcher (1866-1950), who is credited with promoting the woodblock medium in Western art. This is where Bror Nordfeldt went in 1914 and when he returned to the United States, he taught this method at his Modern Art School on Washington Square in the winters and at Provincetown, RI, in the summers. While Nordfeldt was credited for introducing the special genre of color printing known as white-line woodcuts, it was Fletcher’s training that led to these beautiful prints.
nordfeldt training oxford4

Fletcher taught in Oxford, London, and also directed the Edinburgh College of Art until 1923, when he left Great Britain to become the first director of the newly founded Santa Barbara School of Art. In 1916, Fletcher published his seminal text on woodblock printing as one of “The artistic crafts series of technical handbooks” issued by John Hogg. Among many important sections, the volume includes a progressive sequence of collotypes showing the fifteen blocks carved to print one image. Here are a few.

nordfeldt training oxford2
nordfeldt training oxford10      nordfeldt training oxford9 nordfeldt training oxford7  nordfeldt training oxford6  nordfeldt training oxford5

This little book gives an account of one of the primitive crafts, in the practice of which only the simplest tools and materials are used. Their method of use may serve as a means of expression for artist-craftsmen, or may be studied in preparation for, or as a guide towards, more elaborate work in printing, of which the main principles may be seen most clearly in their application in the primitive craft.

In these days the need for reference to primitive handicrafts has not ceased with the advent of the machine. The best achievements of hand-work will always be the standards for reference and on their study must machine craft be based. The machine can only increase the power and scale of the crafts that have already been perfected by hand-work. Their principles, and the art of their design, do not alter under the machine. If the machine disregards these its work becomes base. And it is under the simple conditions of a handicraft that the principles of an art can be most clearly experienced.

The best of all the wonderful and excellent work that is produced today by machinery is that which bears evidence in itself of its derivation from arts under the pure conditions of classic craftsmanship, and shows the influence of their study.- Author’s note