Category Archives: photographs

photographs

Portraits of Helen Keller

helen keller5William M. Notman (1857-1913), Helen Keller and Miss Sullivan, 1897. Gelatin silver print. Graphic Arts Collection GA 2009.00892. Gift of Laurence Hutton.

During the two years I spent in New York I had many opportunities to talk with distinguished people whose names I had often heard, but whom I had never expected to meet. Most of them I met first in the house of my good friend, Mr. Laurence Hutton. It was a great privilege to visit him and dear Mrs. Hutton in their lovely home, and see their library and read the beautiful sentiments and bright thoughts gifted friends had written for them. It has been truly said that Mr. Hutton has the faculty of bringing out in every one the best thoughts and kindest sentiments. One does not need to read “A Boy I Knew” to understand him–the most generous, sweet-natured boy I ever knew, a good friend in all sorts of weather, who traces the footprints of love in the life of dogs as well as in that of his fellowmen.

Mrs. Hutton is a true and tried friend. Much that I hold sweetest, much that I hold most precious, I owe to her. She has oftenest advised and helped me in my progress through college. When I find my work particularly difficult and discouraging, she writes me letters that make me feel glad and brave; for she is one of those from whom we learn that one painful duty fulfilled makes the next plainer and easier.

Mr. Hutton introduced me to many of his literary friends, greatest of whom are Mr. William Dean Howells and Mark Twain. –Helen Keller, The Story of My Life, chapter 23

helen keller4Augustus Marshall (died 1916), Helen Keller, no date. Gelatin silver print. Graphic Arts Collection GA 2009.00891. Gift of Laurence Hutton. Blind stamp on mount: “A. Marshall 16 Arlington St. Boston”. Dedication in pencil: “For Mrs. Hutton, With dear love, From, Helen Keller.”
helen keller3Augustus Marshall (died 1916), Helen Keller, no date [ca. 1899]. Gelatin silver print. Graphic Arts Collection GA 2009.00890. Gift of Laurence Hutton. Dedication in pencil: “Your loving friend, Helen Keller, Easter 1899.”
helen keller2Benjamin J. Falk (1853-1925), Helen Keller, no date. Platinum print. Graphic Arts Collection GA 2009.00831. Gift of Laurence Hutton. Dedication in pencil: “Lovingly yours, Helen Keller.” Signed in imprint: “Print in Platinum – Falk, N.Y.”
helen keller1Benjamin J. Falk (1853-1925), Helen Keller and Anne Sullivan, [no date]. Platinum print. Graphic Arts Collection GA 2009.00832. Gift of Laurence Hutton. Signed by sitter in pencil: “Helen and Teacher.” Signed by sitter in ink: “Annie M. Sullivan.”

 

helen keller6Emily Stokes, Helen Keller with Her Terrier, Phiz, 1902. Albumen silver print. Graphic Arts Collection GA 2010.01663. Gift of Laurence Hutton. Dedication in pencil: “To Uncle Laurence, with the dear love of Phiz and his mistress, May 1902, Helen Keller.”

helen keller8Unidentified artist, Helen Keller in Academic Attire, 1903. Gelatin silver print. Signed in negative: “Copyright 1903 by Whitman” Graphic Arts Collection GA 2010.01794. Gift of Laurence Hutton. Signed in pencil: “Helen Keller.”

 

helen keller7Unidentified artist, Helen Keller, no date [ca. 1899]. Albumen silver print. Graphic Arts Collection GA 2010.02226. Gift of Laurence Hutton.

 

Captain Henry Brewster’s Self-Portrait

brewster5Henry Craigie Brewster (1816-1905) was the youngest son of Sir David Brewster (1781-1868). Henry first practiced photography in 1842, while on leave from the 76th “Hindoostan” Regiment of Foot. This might be a self-portrait from around that time, when Henry was 26 years old. It is among the earliest paper photographs.

The digital image at the top is a truer copy of the dark print. The image below has been lightened with PhotoShop to provide a clearer portrait. It is signed on the verso in several places “Capt. Brewster.”

 

brewster3

Henry Craigie Brewster (1816-1905), Self Portrait, no date [ca.1842]. Salted paper print. Graphic Arts Collection GC137

brewster2 brewster

“Another member of the St. Andrews group, Henry Craigie Brewster (1816-1905), was Sir David’s fourth and youngest son. A captain in the 76th Regiment of Foot, he was named an honorary and corresponding member of the Literary and Philosophical Society in November 1840. In a letter written to Talbot in July 1842, Sir David mentions that his youngest son was on leave from his regiment at Newry.  During this leave Henry Brewster participated in the group’s photographic activities; Sir David mentions his work with that of the Adamsons and Major Playfair in an article on photography published in the Edinburgh Review in January 1843. A quarter of a century later, in The Home Life of Sir David Brewster, Mrs. Gordon recalled that her brother practiced photography under his father’s “superintendence” when home on leave, adding that “it was one of his father’s means of relaxation from heavier work to take positives from the negatives of his son and others.” Henry Brewster continued to practice photography after his return to his regiment in October 1842, and in May 1843 Sir David exhibited a group of his calotype portraits at the Literary and Philosophical Society.”– Graham Smith, Disciples of light (Graphic Arts Collection (GA) 2014-0693Q)

Postmaster General declares that it is illegal to paste photographs into a magazine

aristotypes
In July 1895, Edward L. Wilson, editor of Wilson’s Photographic Magazine, wrote to subscribers about “a new departure” for the journal. Every month since 1864, Wilson had been embellishing each issue with an original photograph pasted into the front. This meant printing up to 6,000 photographs from one or more negatives and then cutting, pasting, and binding them into the magazine by hand.

However by the 1890s, Wilson noted that “the processes of reproduction have grown without number, in such variety as to render the method we have so long employed [albumen silver prints] almost obsolete.” Wilson begins to substitute ink prints made from photographic negatives for the light-sensitive photographs that once embellished each issue of his magazine.

While this is a reasonable decision, the impetus behind the change really came from a letter written by the Postmaster-General of the United States determining that the addition of an original photograph was, in fact, against the law. Here is a transcription of the letter he sent to Wilson:

“Photographic and other matter pasted to printed paper sheets are additional to the original print prohibited by law, which reads that these shall contain no writing, print, or sign thereon or therein in addition to the original print, except as provided by Sec. 3 of Postal Regulations, which provides as follows, to wit: The name and address of the person to whom the matter shall be sent; index figures of subscription-book, either printed or written; the printed title of the publication and the place of its publication; the printed or written name or address without addition of advertisement of the publisher or sender, or both; and written or printed words or figures or both, indicating the date on which the subscription of such matter will end; the correction of any typographical error; a mark except by written or printed words to designate a word or passage to which it is desired to call attention; the words ‘sample copy’ when the matter is sent as such; the words ‘marked copy’ when the matter contains a marked item or article.”

While silver photography does continue to appear from time to time, Wilson focuses on photogravure, color halftone, and other variations of ink prints to embellish his magazine. By 1900, only halftone prints are published.aristotypes4

Specimen of Three Color Gelatine Print
aristotypes3
aristotypes2

Photogravure

 

Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

longfellow3Daniel Huntington (1816-1906), Henry Wadsworth Longfellow (1807-1882), 1876. Oil on canvas. Graphic Arts Collection GA 2006.02629. Signed and dated on verso.

longfellow1Possibly in anticipation of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s upcoming seventieth birthday, the poet sat for the American portrait painter Daniel Huntington (1819-1906) in 1876. The resulting oil on canvas is in the collection of Princeton University Library. Huntington was one of the leading portraitists of the period, as well as president of the American Academy of Arts Council; a founding member of the Century Association; vice-president of the Metropolitan Museum of Art; and a trustee of the Lenox Library. It is surprising that he had time to paint.

The Graphic Arts Collection holds eighteen portraits of Longfellow in various mediums. Here are two others.

longfellow6

longfellow5Unidentified photographer, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow in his study, no date [about 1881]. Albumen silver print. Graphic Arts collection GA 2009.01006. Dedication in ink, below: “‘Bon voyage’–To my dear young friend, E.J.S. // from Henry W. Longfellow // Cambridge, 1881”.

longfellow4Julia Margaret Cameron (1815-1879), Henry Wadsworth Longfellow (1807-1882), 1868. Albumen silver print. Graphic Arts collection GA 2010.02212. Inscribed in ink, on mount, l.l.: “From life Registered Photograph taken at Fresh Water July 1868”.

 

William Henry Jackson

jackson5

In 1890, Edward Wilson asked the Denver-based photographer William Henry Jackson (1843-1942) for a negative to publish in Wilson’s Photographic Magazine. Instead of one, Jackson sent ten and Wilson printed them all.

In various copies of the April 5 issue (v. 27, no. 367) readers will find ten very different photographs, printed by the Philadelphia studio of Roberts & Fellows. The Princeton University Library copy has “Calle de Guadeloupe. Chinuahua,” showing a pastoral scene with a circle of covered wagons.

Jackson completists will have to also find “A Gen near Caviota, Mexico,” “Lagos. General view, showing the cathedral,” “Lagos, from the river,” “Queretaro Fountain, near the church. Santa Clara,” “Popocatapetl [or Popocatepetl] Mountain, from Tiamacas,” “In the Garden. Santa Barbara Mission,” “The Arizona Garden. Hotel del Monte,” “The Ferns. Hotel del Monte,” and “The Cypresses of Monterey.”

Surprisingly, Princeton also owns a separate print of “Lagos. general view, showing the cathedral” [see below] so we have two of the ten.
jackson7
jackson6 jackson9

jackson8

Lulu Farini, Cross-Dressing Acrobat and Amateur Photographer

karini3karini2A photograph entitled “Cape Town, Africa” by Lulu Farini (Samuel Wasgott, 1855-1939) of Bridgeport, Connecticut, was printed in the September 1887 issue of The Philadelphia Photographer. The negative was made by a celebrated cross-dressing acrobat, born Samuel Wasgatt who performed under the name El Niño Farini and later, Lulu [above right].

Born in the United States, Wasgatt became the protégée of a Canadian acrobat William L. Hunt (1838-1929), also known as Signor Guillermo Farini [above left]. While working in France, the Farninis made the decision to dress the slender young boy as a girl and for five years the change went undetected. Their sold-out performances included various acts on a trapeze, tightrope walking, and being shot out of a cannon, now advertised as The Great Farini and Lulu.

2006ah6276-el-nino-farini-on-trapeze_290x290ninofariniandwilliamhunt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In 1885, the Farinis traveled to South Africa and Lulu (who had returned to dressing as a man and married Hunt’s daughter), documented their journey in the Kalahari Desert with his camera. Returning later that year, Lulu had several exhibitions of these photographs in London http://erps.dmu.ac.uk/exhibitor_details.php?year=1885&efn=Lulu+Farini and then, published them in the book Through the Kalahari Desert; a Narrative of a Journey with Gun, Camera, and Note-book to Lake N’gami and Back (Firestone (F) DT995.K2 F2 1886).
karini

In 1887,  Lulu Farini submitted one of his photographs to The Philadelphia Photographer, where over 6,000 copies were printed and published as the frontispiece of the September issue. Edward Wilson wrote: “Through the courtesy of Mr. Lulu Farini, Bridgeport, Conn., we are permitted once more to give a picture of that far-off, though well-known country—a view of Cape Horn and vicinity. Altogether, it is one of the strangest of landscapes, showing the curious site of a curious city and its marvelous natural surroundings. . . With reference to the view, we refer to a letter received from the talented African traveller and excellent photographer, Mr. Farini, who writes as follows:

“Is it possible that there is enough merit in my poor picture of Cape Horn and the Lion’s Head to justify its being honored by publication in your magazine?’ I have always felt a consciousness that this particular plate should be classed among the failures, not only on account of its technical imperfections, but because of its conveying so feeble an impression of a scene worth travelling many thousand miles to witness. When I look at this picture it makes me feel sad to think that I must be content with so insignificant a reward for the labor and patience expended on its production.”

“During the week’s interval between our landing at the Cape and continuing our journey southward to the Kalahari Desert, I found food for my camera in Cape Town and its picturesque surroundings. Instantaneous views from a row-boat were made of the harbor and town, backed with Table Mountain, which towers above the whole like a perpendicular wall 5000 feet high; to reach its summit one must climb by circuitous paths, and the time required to perform this upward journey averages six hours.”

“But, providing the sky is clear, no one will regret the laborious task, for the view from this elevation is magnificent. Not infrequently, however, is the sightseer not only disappointed, but put to considerable inconvenience and risk of personal safety, for it is no rare occurrence to have a dense fog shut down over the mountain totally obscuring the distant view, and, at the same time, increasing the difficulty and danger of climbing—in fact, many lives have been lost where the impatient tourist has rebelled against a prolonged imprisonment, and in attempting to regain a lower altitude, has fallen over the perpendicular cliff.”-L. Farnini

 

 

farini (2)“The Change in Lulu,” Chicago Daily Tribune September 12, 1885: 12.

The American Coloritype Company

kurtz1“Learning of Georg Meisenbach’s success with halftone printing in England, [William] Kurtz set out to reproduce the process and in doing so, became one of the United States’ first commercial practitioners of reproducing photographic plates in halftone prints . . . Likewise, when Hermann Wilhelm Vogel’s advances in color photography became known, Kurtz arranged to purchase the American rights to the ‘three-color process’ from Vogel and was able to devise a way to apply it to halftone printing.” (S.H. Horgan, Inland Printer, August 1921)

William Kurtz’s first three-color photoengraving, called a Coloritype, was published in the January 1, 1893, issue of Photographische Mittheilungen, Vogel’s Berlin photography journal. Two months later, the same image was used as a frontispiece of The Engraver & Printer, a small trade publication, which had attempted three-color printing several years earlier (see John Bidwell, “’The Engraver and Printer’, a Boston Trade Journal of the Eighteen Nineties,” The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 71, no. 1 (1977): 29-48).

After these two relatively limited uses of the process, Edward Wilson financed the printing of over 6,000 Coloritypes for the May 1893 issue of Wilson’s Photographic Magazine [seen above]. “This illustration,” wrote Horgan, “proved to the whole printing world that reproductions of colors by photography into three half-tone blocks to be printed in colored inks had arrived.”

Contrary to published sources, Kurtz applied for and received a patent on his process (Letters Patent of the U.S. no. 498,396A granted May 30, 1893), but this did little to stop printers and publishers across the country making their own three-color prints.

While Kurtz’s Coloritype Company leased five floors at 32 Lafayette in lower Manhattan, with a public gallery on the ground floor, Gustave Zeese formed the Chicago Colortype Company (dropping the ‘I’ from the name), Julius Regenstein established the Photo Colortype Company, and Frederick Osgood’s Osgood Engraving Company switched to Colortypes. In New York, the Moss Colortype Company did the same but advertised theirs as Moss-types. Kurtz’s $200,000 investment was overwhelmed by it competitors and his company was eventually bought-out, leaving Kurtz bankrupt.

Edward Wilson had for many years been documenting the experiments of Vogel, Kurtz, and others in his monthly magazine. Here is the note he published in the April 1893 issue of Wilson’s Photographic Magazine, describing the history of three-color printing to date.
kurtz4
kurtz5
kurtz6

See also: American Colortype Company. Annual report (Clifton, N.J.: The Company). RECAP HD9729 .A49.

Note: Most of the digital sources of early colortype printing have been reproduced online without color and so, original paper sources must be used for research. See: The Philadelphia Photographer (Philadelphia, Pa.: Benerman & Wilson, 1864-1888). Continued by Wilson’s Photographic Magazine. Graphic Arts Collection (GAX) 2015-0580N and 2007 0008M.

An index to the photographs and early photoengravings published by Wilson is being completed and will be published here soon.

The Lady of the Lake Photographed

lady of the lakeSame author, same publisher, same photographer, and only three years apart but very different books. A recent acquisition helps to demonstrate how many photographically illustrated publications vary enormously from one to another. The negatives were created and hundreds of positive prints pasted into the volumes with little or no consistency. In the case of this book, the negatives may have been discarded or worn out and so, new photographs were taken of the same landmark views.

Wilson employed thirty assistants who were constantly printing, tinting, mounting and filling orders while Wilson traveled throughout Great Britain capturing picturesque views. His business flourished for more than twenty years, leaving dozens, if not hundreds, of variant editions of his books.

lady of the lake5

lady of the lake4

lady of the lake3

lady of the lake2

Walter Scott (1771-1832), The Lady of the Lake; with all his introductions, various readings, and the editor’s notes ; illustrated by numerous engravings on wood from drawings by Birket Foster and John Gilbert. Author’s ed. (Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black, 1869). Ten albumen silver prints by George Washington Wilson (1825-1893). Graphic Arts Collection (GAX) TR647.W546 S36

Walter Scott (1771-1832), The Lady of the Lake (Edinburgh: A. and C. Black, [1866]). Eleven albumen prints by George Washington Wilson (1825-1893). Graphic Arts Collection GAX in processlady of the lake6

“Perhaps there is not another name among the galaxy of bright stars in the photographic firmament that shines more brightly than that of George Washington Wilson, of Aberdeen, Scotland. Like the wise men of the East, have the photographic fraternity watched the brilliant effects which radiate from this photographic star. . . Mr. Wilson commenced his photographic career some twenty years ago. His first experience in connection with the art was in painting or coloring miniatures on ivory and paper. While engaged in this class of artistic labor he became greatly enamored with the photographic art. It dawned upon him one day that he must either advance with the tide or get drowned in the flood of photography, which was swelling up in the distance.”

“Another season he concluded to try his skill in the production of instantaneous views, and with this purport in view he lodged for a month or two, near one of those beautiful small lakes, which abound in Scotland, watching and waiting for a favorable opportunity, and whenever a prominent sunset view made its appearance, photographed it to the best of his ability. It was these sunset and cloud views that brought his name prominently before the photographic world. Although it has been nearly thirteen years since these cloud and sunset views were secured, the popular demand for them has not abated in the least. Only the day before Mr. Wilson sent us the negatives from which our illustration is printed, did he complete the filling of an order for forty-six dozen of those views. Since he made those cloud and sunset views, he has visited many famous places, and in many instances the same places have been visited over and over again, making new negatives and for the purpose of renewing old ones. –Richard Walzl, The Photographer’s Friend: A Practical, Independent Magazine, Devoted to the Photographic Art 2 (1872): 48-50.

Reverse painting on glass over a photograph

painted photograph2Artist unidentified, El Capitan, ca. 1870. Frame: 81 x 66.5 cm. Graphic Arts Collection

This reverse painting on glass features an albumen silver print as the basis for the nineteenth-century landscape. Also called verre églomisé, after Jean-Baptiste Glomy (1711-1886), reverse painting has been practiced since the Middle Ages. Conservators and curators at the Winterthur Museum posted an excellent description at http://www.winterthur.org/pdfs/winterthur_primer_glass.pdf.

Often in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, an engraving would be used to establish the outline or basic design of the painting. When photography became viable in the nineteenth century, portraits in particular were painted over low resolution photographic prints.

While the exact photograph under our painting has not been identified, it could be one of the mammoth prints made by Carleton Watkins (1829–1916). He photographed Yosemite Valley a number of times during the 1860s, while working for the California State Geological Survey. Many of these were reprinted over the years in a variety of sizes and formats.

w3065lc (2)Carleton Watkins (1829-1916), Tutocanula, or El Capitan, 3600 feet, no date.

When examining the reverse painting closely, you can see the photograph has been torn around the edge of the trees and mountains, leaving a clear area to paint the sky. The highlights, usually done last when painting on canvas, must be laid down first on glass in order for them to be seen when the glass pane is turned around.
painted photograph3

painted photograph

A View of the Capitol in 1866

bell capitalWilliam Bell (1830-1910), “United States Capitol Building,” in The Philadelphia Photographer 4, no. 43 (July 1867). Graphic Arts Collection 2007.0008.

It is curious that one of the most valued photographs published in Edward L. Wilson’s The Philadelphia Photographer was unplanned and offered to readers with an apology. The Canadian photographer William Notman had given Wilson negatives to print for the July issue but when the prints were damaged, Wilson scrambled to find a substitute.

William Bell (not to be confused with William A. Bell or William H. Bell) was well-known in Philadelphia, having worked at John Keenan’s daguerreotype studio since 1848. After serving in U.S. Army during the Civil War, Bell moved to Washington D.C. as chief photographer at the U.S. Army Medical Museum. For whatever reason, this position did not last long and in 1867, Bell returned to Philadelphia, bought James McClees’s photography studio at 1200 Chestnut Street, and opened his own business.

William Bell (American, born England, 1830-1910), United States Capitol Building, 1866, albumen silver print, Museum Purchase: Photography Fund, no known copyright restrictions, 2003.26.1

William Bell (American, born England, 1830-1910), United States Capitol Building, 1866, albumen silver print, Museum Purchase: Photography Fund, no known copyright restrictions, 2003.26.1

According to Bell’s notes, his negatives of the Capitol were made in 1866 and he probably carried them back when he moved home. As usual, multiple glass plates were given to Wilson, who arranged for the contact printing of hundreds of albumen silver prints to be pasted into each issue of his magazine.

Note the photograph at the Portland Museum of Art [left] is slight different, missing the final row of windows seen above on the right.

bell capital4
bell capital3
bell capital2